Here Comes HillaryCare 2.0

There’s an entire generation of millennial voters who aren’t even old enough to remember HillaryCare in its time (myself included, I confess), but if you’re about 35 or older you can probably recall Hillary Clinton’s signature health care initiative going down in flames. Twenty years later, with Hillary ready to accept her party’s nomination for president, Democrats appear to be setting the stage for a HillaryCare 2.0 push that will be based around one of Obamacare’s original pillars – the so-called “public option”.

May it suffer the same fate as HillaryCare 1.0.

As reported by The Hill, President Obama wrote in the Journal of the American Medical Association that “I think Congress should revisit a public plan to compete alongside private insurers in areas of the country where competition is limited.” As he notes, such a plan was included in the early drafts of what would become known as Obamacare. What he doesn’t note is that at the time such a proposal was a bridge too far even for a good number of Democrats.

Opposition to the public option was, admittedly, in part because of pressure from the health insurance industry, whose powerful lobby eventually had a major part in drafting the Affordable Care Act. But it was also because a number of moderate Democrats (do those still exist?) correctly recognized that a “public option” was inevitably just a step on the path to a fully government-owned, single-payer health care system. Whether they personally supported or opposed British-style government health care, wise Democrats at the time realized that America was not even close to accepting a total government takeover of such a personal good.

So what has changed? Partially the makeup of the Democratic Party. Many of the moderate, “Blue Dog” Democrats suffered electoral consequences of its party going far-left and embracing President Obama and Obamacare. The fact that Bernie Sanders, an avowed socialist, performed so well in the Democratic primary should certainly embolden the most hardcore progressives within the party.

Another thing that has changed is that the structure of Obamacare has naturally led to a collapse in competition and an increase in costs within the individual health insurance market. Guess what happens when you require health insurers to charge young healthy people the same as older sicker people and require that every plan cover every individual for every condition? Prices go up, quality hovers around the minimum allowed, and health insurers start taking losses and decide they don’t want to play this game anymore (a game they helped rig, but who’s keeping track?).

Even then-Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid admitted, in a moment of rare candor in 2013, that Obamacare was not a long-term solution and was only a step on the road to single-payer, government care.

And so the Democrats come riding to the rescue on a white stallion called “Public Option.” Because if those insurance companies cannot provide the kind of affordable plans that Obamacare impossibly expects them to, then the kind government can step in and provide them some extra… competition. It’s like free markets, except that the government can use its bulk to undercut any private competitor, and before long – oops – only the government option remains. Guess that under the individual mandate, everyone will have to buy a government plan.

The timing is not a coincidence, as Hillary Clinton heads to receive her coronation at the DNC convention. Hillary has been touting the public option for months, and the rapid decay of Obamacare will provide her with the excuse to push for it should she take up residence in the White House. Doubtless, she would love a chance to try to make good on her most spectacular failure: the abrupt collapse of the health care proposal that came to bear her name. Wrapped around the core of the public option, the larvae that will metamorphose into a true universal government health care system, HillaryCare 2.0 would be far more ambitious in fact than its predecessor.

Of course, the GOP-controlled House would never go for such a thing. But look for health care to be used as a bludgeon against them as the Democrats try to paint a public option as the only possible next step.

This article originally appeared on Conservative Review.

Subscribe on YouTube

Free the People publishes opinion-based articles from contributing writers. The opinions and ideas expressed do not always reflect the opinions and ideas that Free the People endorses. We believe in free speech, and in providing a platform for open dialog. Feel free to leave a comment!

Josh Withrow

Josh Withrow is the former Director of Public Policy at Free the People. He transitioned from studying medieval history to modern policy, only to find nothing has changed.

View Full Bio

Add comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Featured Product

Join Us